Current work
- REVISED "Follow the money! Why dividends overreact to flat-tax reforms", with Laurent Bach, Arthur Guillouzouic, Claire Leroy and Clément Malgouyres. [working paper PSE, HAL]
- FINAL "Does Tax-Benefit Linkage Matter for the Incidence of Payroll Taxes?", with Thomas Breda, Julien Grenet and Arthur Guillouzouic.
- "Escape or Play Again? How Retiring Entrepreneurs Respond to the Wealth Tax", with Laurent Bach, Arthur Guillouzouic, and Clément Malgouyres.
- NEW "Do Billionaires Pay Taxes?", with Laurent Bach, Arthur Guillouzouic an Clément Malgouyres.
We estimate behavioral responses to dividend taxation using recent French reforms: a rate hike and, five years later, a cut. Exploiting tax data at household and firm-level as well as data linking firms and shareholders, we find very large dividend tax elasticities to both reforms. Individuals who control firms adjust dividend receipts instantaneously, accounting for most of the aggregate dividend reaction. Investment is insensitive to dividend taxation. Dividend adjustments are instead driven by corporate saving, as owner-managers treat firms as low-tax saving vehicles. Corporate profits decline following dividend tax increases, suggesting firms also serve as tax-free consumption vehicles. Our results fit the 'new view' of dividend taxation, provided an additional low-tax yet costly payout option is available that offers a tax arbitrage opportunity to entrepreneurs in control of their firms.
We study the earnings responses to six large payroll tax and income tax reforms in France. We find evidence of full pass-through to workers in cases where there is a strong and clear relationship between contributions and expected benefits. By contrast, we find a limited pass-through of employer payroll taxes to workers for reforms with no tax-benefit linkage, and close to full pass-through to workers for income tax reforms nominally incident on employees. Together with a meta-analysis of the literature, we interpret these results as evidence that tax-benefit linkage matters for incidence of payroll taxes, a claim long made by the literature but not backed by empirical evidence to date. Absent tax-benefit linkage, our results suggest that the individual-level incidence of payroll taxes aligns with their statutory incidence.
Using an exhaustive panel of French income and wealth taxpayers, we find that entrepreneurs pay far more wealth taxes once they retire. Despite this, entrepreneurs do not leave France more often than high-wage employees upon retirement. Rather, retired entrepreneurs reinvest part of the proceeds from the sale of their business into tax-favored angel investments.
We link French households' tax records to the corporations they control, and build a payout-policy-neutral income measure, with corresponding tax burdens including those of "billionaires": the top 0.0002%. Defined as such, income is more concentrated than taxable income, it better predicts rich-list membership, and persists more among billionaires. Personal taxes remain progressive until the top 0.1%, but eventually decline to 2% of income. Corporate taxes are an imperfect progressive backstop, as total tax rates fall from 45% at the 0.1% threshold to 25% for billionaires. Among these, the tax burden is global and tax-efficient pyramidal control over businesses ubiquitous.